Salesforce investors recently voted against the company’s compensation plan for top executives, especially CEO Marc Benioff. The resolution to approve the compensation received more votes against it than in favor, indicating a significant level of disapproval from shareholders. This raises concerns about the equity awards granted to Benioff and the overall compensation structure for executives at Salesforce.
Two shareholder advisory groups, Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services, recommended that investors vote against the compensation plan. They expressed concerns about the substantial equity grants issued to Benioff, particularly a $20 million long-term equity award given in January. Glass Lewis specifically mentioned a lack of a convincing rationale behind these grants and questioned their necessity, considering Benioff’s significant existing stake in the company.
In the 2024 fiscal year, Benioff received a total pay of $39.6 million, which was higher than the previous year. While his salary remained flat at $1.55 million, he received additional stock and option awards, as well as nonequity incentive plan compensation. The package also included security fees that had not been invoiced to the company before. The compensation committee justified the additional equity awards as a recognition of Benioff’s leadership and the company’s financial performance.
Shareholders raised concerns about the discretionary nature of the equity grants and the potential misalignment of interests between executives and investors. Glass Lewis pointed out that Benioff’s interests were already well-aligned with those of shareholders due to his significant stake in Salesforce, making additional performance-based awards unnecessary. This calls into question the rationale behind the compensation decisions made by the board.
The vote against the compensation plan is nonbinding, meaning that the board is not legally required to change the executive compensation structure based on the shareholder disapproval. However, the board stated in the proxy statement that they value the opinions expressed by shareholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions. This indicates a willingness to address the concerns raised by investors.
Salesforce shares rose significantly in the 2024 fiscal year, with strong financial performance and increased revenue. However, the company also faced challenges, such as layoffs and pressure from activist investors to prioritize profit and growth. The decision to start paying dividends to shareholders reflects a shift in the company’s financial strategies. Despite the positive performance, Salesforce shares are currently down year to date, suggesting ongoing challenges for the company.
The controversy surrounding Salesforce’s executive compensation highlights the importance of aligning executive pay with shareholder interests and justifying equity grants in a transparent manner. The board’s response to shareholder disapproval will be crucial in maintaining investor confidence and ensuring that executive compensation decisions are made in the best interests of the company and its stakeholders.
Leave a Reply