Upon revisiting the tactical game genre, I discovered a new game called No Plan B that seemed to offer everything I enjoy in such games. From close combat tactics to squad management, it appeared to have it all. However, as I delved deeper into the game, I realized that there were also aspects that I found unappealing.
No Plan B tasks players with assembling a squad, equipping them, and executing move-and-shoot commands in real-time. The game offers both standalone missions and roguelike campaigns, providing a variety of gameplay options. While this may sound interesting, the execution of these tasks may be too complex for some players, as the UI is described as fiddly and difficult to navigate. This could potentially lead to frustration and impact the overall gaming experience.
The roguelike element in No Plan B adds a layer of uncertainty and risk to the gameplay. While some players may enjoy the high stakes of not having a “plan B,” others may find it daunting and discouraging. The thought of repeating missions and facing harsh consequences for failure may deter some players from fully engaging with the game.
One aspect of No Plan B that stands out is its 3D character design, which some may describe as blandly cartoony. While this may appeal to some players, others may find it lacking in depth and realism. The visual style of the game plays a significant role in the overall gaming experience, and the cartoony design may not resonate with all players.
No Plan B offers an intriguing mix of tactical gameplay elements, but it may fall short in terms of user interface, difficulty level, and visual design. While the game has its strengths, such as a variety of missions and a replay feature, it may not be suitable for all players. Ultimately, the decision to purchase No Plan B should be based on personal preferences and tolerance for challenging gameplay mechanics.
Leave a Reply